Dedicated playbook for Investment Agreement

Term sheets are written by their lawyers. Know what you're giving up.

Liquidation preferences that pay investors twice before you see a dollar. Anti-dilution terms that crush founders in a down round. Understand your term sheet before you sign away equity.

60-second analysis · No credit card · Your data stays yours

non-participating preferred is market for seed / Series A
BBWA
broad-based weighted average is the market anti-dilution
2-1
founder-to-investor board balance at seed
20%
option pool created pre-money is a typical dilution trap

What Investment Agreement agreements hide in plain sight

The most common red flags we catch in this contract type.

Participating preferred that pays investors twice in an exit

Investors get their money back AND their pro-rata share of the remainder — double-dipping on exit.

Full-ratchet anti-dilution that destroys founder equity in a down round

Re-prices investor shares as if they invested at the new low — massive founder dilution.

Drag-along rights that force a sale you oppose

A small investor group can trigger a whole-company sale regardless of founder preference.

Redemption rights that force a buyout you can't afford

Investors can demand cash back after a defined period — a hidden solvency risk.

Why this contract type is different

The three things that decide whether your Investment Agreement holds up

A term sheet is not a shopping list — every clause interacts with every other clause. A 1x non-participating preferred sounds reasonable and is. A 2x participating preferred with broad drag-along sounds only slightly worse and is catastrophic on exit: investors get 2x their money AND their pro-rata share of the remainder, and can force the sale.

Anti-dilution is the second compounding lever. Broad-based weighted average is the market structure and is fair to both sides in a down round. Full ratchet re-prices ALL of the investor's shares at the new low price — a small down round can wipe out founder equity entirely. This is often buried in a schedule and easy to miss.

The option pool shuffle is the quietest founder tax. Investors ask for a 15-20% pool 'created pre-money' — which means the founders bear all of the dilution while the investor gets the same ownership at a lower effective price. Push the option pool to post-money or reduce the size to match hiring plans.

What ContractScan AI analyzes in your Investment Agreement

A dedicated playbook — built for this contract type only.

  • Liquidation preference

    Type (participating vs non-participating) and multiple.

  • Anti-dilution type

    Broad-based weighted average (market) vs full ratchet (founder-hostile).

  • Pro-rata rights

    Scope and whether they extend to later rounds.

  • Board composition

    Investor seats vs founder seats and observer rights.

  • Drag-along rights

    Threshold to trigger, board approval requirement, and protections for minority.

  • Information rights

    Reporting frequency, financials, and observer access.

  • Founder vesting

    Cliff, schedule, and acceleration on termination or acquisition.

  • Redemption rights

    When investors can force buyback and the cash impact.

Red flags we see in real Investment Agreements

Specific patterns to check for before you sign — with the fix for each.

Participating preferred (2x or more)

Double-dips on exit. Push to 1x non-participating.

Full-ratchet anti-dilution

Founder-hostile in any down round. Broad-based weighted average is the market.

Large pre-money option pool

Comes entirely out of the founders. Reduce or move to post-money.

Broad drag-along with low threshold

A minority investor group can force a sale. Set the threshold at 50%+ of common.

Negotiation playbook

How to negotiate a Investment Agreement

The concrete asks we recommend, in the order to raise them.

  1. 1
    Lock 1x non-participating preferred as the liquidation preference
  2. 2
    Insist on broad-based weighted average anti-dilution
  3. 3
    Move the option pool post-money or reduce to match a real hiring plan
  4. 4
    Cap drag-along at 50%+ of common, including a majority of founders
  5. 5
    3-person board at seed: 2 founders + 1 investor (or independent)
  6. 6
    Redemption rights only after 7+ years and only if the company is cash-positive

Here's what your report looks like

Plain English. No legal jargon. Action you can take today.

Verdict
Review and Negotiate Before Signing
Score
58/100
Top 3 risks in your Investment Agreement
1
Participating preferred that pays investors twice in an exit

Investors get their money back AND their pro-rata share of the remainder — double-dipping on exit.

2
Full-ratchet anti-dilution that destroys founder equity in a down round

Re-prices investor shares as if they invested at the new low — massive founder dilution.

3
Drag-along rights that force a sale you oppose

A small investor group can trigger a whole-company sale regardless of founder preference.

The cost of getting it wrong

A bad term sheet doesn't feel bad on the day the wire lands. It feels bad four years later, when a modest acquisition offer arrives and the founders discover that after liquidation preferences, participation, and anti-dilution adjustments, they clear less than a year's salary each. Fix the term sheet in week one — you cannot renegotiate on the eve of an exit.

Who uses this

Founders raising seed or Series A

Spot founder-unfriendly terms before signing the term sheet.

Angel investors

Validate that the term sheet matches market norms.

Startup co-founders

Understand exactly how new investor rights reshape your cap table.

Frequently asked questions

What is a liquidation preference?

Who gets paid first — and how much — when the company is sold. 1x non-participating is founder-friendly. Participating preferred with a high multiple can mean founders receive very little even in a good exit.

Full-ratchet vs weighted-average anti-dilution?

Full-ratchet resets investor price to the new lower price in a down round — extreme dilution for founders. Weighted-average adjusts proportionally — far more founder-friendly and market standard.

What board composition is reasonable at seed?

One investor, one founder, one independent director is market standard. Investors taking board majority at seed is aggressive — push back.

Ready to check your Investment Agreement?

Upload your contract and get an AI review in under a minute — written in plain English with one clear recommendation per clause.